––––––––––––––––
QUANTUM CORPORATION
––––––––––––––––

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of the close of business on August 1, 2014, there were 253,840,119 shares of Quantum Corporation’s common stock issued and outstanding.

QUANTUM CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except par value)
(Unaudited)

QUANTUM CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
Product revenue	$	80,194		$	85,849
Service revenue		38,500			36,492
Royalty revenue		9,434			25,508
Total revenue		128,128			147,849
Cost of product revenue		54,908			58,783
Cost of service revenue		17,694			19,231
Total cost of revenue		72,602			78,014
Gross margin		55,526			69,835
Operating expenses:
Research and development		14,554			16,694
Sales and marketing		27,705			30,158
General and administrative		14,371			14,689
Restructuring charges		865			2,559
Total operating expenses		57,495			64,100
Gain on sale of assets		462			—
Income (loss) from operations		(1,507	)		5,735
Other income and expense		(125	)		375
Interest expense		(2,444	)		(2,439	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(4,076	)		3,671
Income tax provision		248			390
Net income (loss)	$	(4,324	)	$	3,281

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share	$	(0.02	)	$	0.01

Weighted average shares:
Basic		250,666			243,309
Diluted		250,666			245,844

QUANTUM CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
Net income (loss)	$	(4,324	)	$	3,281
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		9			(69	)
Net unrealized gain (loss) on revaluation of long-term
intercompany balances		58			(64	)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		67			(133	)
Total comprehensive income (loss)	$	(4,257	)	$	3,148

QUANTUM CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)

QUANTUM CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Quantum Corporation (“Quantum”, the “Company”, “us” or “we”), founded in 1980, is a leading expert in scale-out storage, archive and data protection, providing solutions for capturing, sharing and preserving digital assets over the entire data lifecycle. Our customers, ranging from small businesses to major enterprises, trust us to address their most demanding data workflow challenges. We provide solutions for storing and protecting information in physical, virtual and cloud environments that are designed to help customers Be Certain^TM they have an end-to-end storage foundation to maximize the value of their data by making it accessible whenever and wherever needed, retaining it indefinitely and reducing total cost and complexity. We work closely with a broad network of distributors, value-added resellers (“VARs”), direct marketing resellers (“DMRs”), original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) and other suppliers to meet customers’ evolving needs. Our stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol QTM.

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Quantum and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of the results for the periods shown. The results of operations for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full fiscal year. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2014 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date, but it does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 6, 2014.

In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (“ASU 2013-11”). ASU 2013-11 requires an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit as a reduction of a deferred tax asset for an net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforward, or similar tax loss or tax credit carryforward, rather than as a liability when (1) the uncertain tax position would reduce the NOL or other carryforward under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction and (2) the entity intends to use the deferred tax asset for that purpose. ASU 2013-11 does not require new recurring disclosures. ASU 2013-11 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. We adopted ASU 2013-11 prospectively in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. Adoption did not impact our statements of financial position or results of operations.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 requires entities to recognize revenue through the application of a five-step model, which includes identification of the contract, identification of the performance obligations, determination of the transaction price, allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations and recognition of revenue as the entity satisfies the performance obligations. ASU 2014-09 will become effective for us beginning April 1, 2017, or fiscal 2018. We are currently evaluating the guidance to determine the potential impact on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and financial statement disclosures.

In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period (“ASU 2014-12”). ASU 2014-12 requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period is treated as a performance condition. ASU 2014-12 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. We plan to adopt ASU 2014-12 prospectively in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 and do not anticipate adoption will impact our statements of financial position or results of operations.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we identified an error related to certain allowances recorded for estimated future price adjustments with a cumulative $0.7 million overstatement of revenue and accounts receivable at April 1, 2013. Revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2014 was $0.1 million overstated as a result of this error. We also identified an error related to straight-line rent expense that had accumulated since fiscal 2006, resulting in a $2.1 million cumulative overstatement of rent expense and total other accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities at April 1, 2013. General and administrative expense was overstated by less than $0.1 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2014.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we evaluated these errors in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99 and determined that the cumulative impact of the errors was not material to our results of operations, financial position or cash flows in our previously issued financial statements and; therefore, amendments of previously filed reports are not required. However, if the entire correction of the errors had been recorded during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, the impact would have been significant to the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2014. As a result, we revised our prior period financial statements in accordance with the SEC's Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108.

We believe the revisions are not material to the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations, Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income or Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three months ended June 30, 2013.

The assets measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis consist of money market funds, which are included in cash and cash equivalents in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, and are valued using quoted market prices (level 1 fair value measurements) at the respective balance sheet dates (in thousands):

We did not record impairments to any non-financial assets in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 or 2014. We do not have any non-financial liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

Our financial liabilities were comprised solely of convertible subordinated debt at June 30, 2014 and March 31, 2014. The carrying value and fair value based on quoted market prices in less active markets (level 2 fair value measurement) were as follows (in thousands):

Manufacturing inventories and service parts inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):

We evaluate our amortizable and indefinite-lived intangible assets (“long-lived assets”) for impairment whenever indicators of impairment exist and concluded the carrying amount of our long-lived assets was recoverable and there was no impairment in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 or 2014. The following provides a summary of the carrying value of intangible assets (in thousands):

We evaluate goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year, or more frequently when indicators of impairment are present. There were no changes to goodwill balances during the first quarter of fiscal 2015. The following table provides a summary of the goodwill balance at both June 30, 2014 and March 31, 2014 (in thousands):

We warrant our products against defects for 1 to 3 years. A provision for estimated future costs and estimated returns for credit relating to warranty is recorded when products are shipped and revenue recognized. Our estimate of future costs to satisfy warranty obligations is primarily based on historical trends and, if believed to be significantly different from historical trends, estimates of future failure rates and future costs of repair. Future costs of repair include materials consumed in the repair, labor and overhead amounts necessary to perform the repair. If future actual failure rates differ from our estimates, we record the impact in subsequent periods. If future actual costs of repair were to differ significantly from our estimates, we would record the impact of these unforeseen cost differences in subsequent periods.

On April 24, 2014, our credit agreement with Wells Fargo (“WF credit agreement”) was amended to allow us to use proceeds from the credit agreement to repay our convertible subordinated notes so long as we have a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.5 and liquidity of $25 million. Our amendment also impacted the available line, maturity date and certain covenants and compliance obligations which are reflected below.

Under the WF credit agreement, as amended, we have the ability to borrow the lesser of $75 million or the amount of the monthly borrowing base under a senior secured revolving credit facility. The WF credit agreement matures March 29, 2017 so long as an amount sufficient to repay the $133.7 million of 3.50% convertible subordinated notes due November 15, 2015 is available for borrowing under the WF credit agreement or is deposited in an escrow account prior to August 16, 2015. Otherwise, the WF credit agreement matures on August 16, 2015. Quarterly, we are required to pay a 0.375% commitment fee on undrawn amounts under the revolving credit facility.

The WF credit agreement contains customary covenants, including cross-default provisions, as well as financial covenants. Average liquidity must exceed $15.0 million each month. The fixed charge coverage ratio is required to be greater than 1.2 for the 12 month period ending on the last day of any month in which the covenant is applicable. This covenant is applicable only in months in which borrowings exceed $5.0 million at any time during the month. To avoid triggering mandatory field audits and Wells Fargo controlling our cash receipts, we must maintain liquidity of at least $20.0 million at all times. The fixed charge coverage ratio, average liquidity and liquidity are defined in the WF credit agreement and/or amendments. Certain schedules in the compliance certificate must be filed monthly if borrowings exceed $5.0 million; otherwise they are to be filed quarterly.

We have letters of credit totaling $1.0 million, reducing the maximum amount available to borrow by this amount at June 30, 2014. As of June 30, 2014, and during the first quarter of fiscal 2015, we were in compliance with all covenants and had no outstanding balance on the line of credit.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2015, restructuring charges were primarily the result of further consolidating a facility previously used by our manufacturing and service operations. The restructuring charges in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 were largely due to strategic management decisions to outsource our manufacturing operations and further consolidate production and service activities. The types of restructuring expense for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013 were (in thousands):

The following tables show the activity and the estimated timing of future payouts for accrued restructuring (in thousands):

The severance and benefits restructuring costs for the three months ended June 30, 2014 was primarily due to right-sizing our sales workforce with our operating plans, and the facilities restructuring costs were primarily the result of further consolidating production and service locations. We anticipate $0.4 million of severance and benefits and the other restructuring accrual will be paid by the end of fiscal 2015 and the remaining $0.1 million of severance and benefits will be paid by the end of fiscal 2016. Facility restructuring accruals will be paid in accordance with the respective facility lease terms.

No stock options were granted during the first quarter of fiscal 2015 or 2014. The Black-Scholes option pricing model is used to estimate the fair value of stock options.

The fair value of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) granted is the intrinsic value as of the respective grant date since the RSUs are granted at no cost to the employee. The weighted-average grant date fair values of RSUs granted during the first quarter of fiscal 2015 and 2014 were $1.21 and $1.32, respectively.

Under the Stock Purchase Plan, rights to purchase shares are typically granted during the second and fourth quarter of each fiscal year. No rights to purchase shares were granted during the first quarter of fiscal 2015 or fiscal 2014. The Black-Scholes option pricing model is used to estimate the fair value of rights to acquire stock granted under our Purchase Plan.

A summary of activity relating to our stock options follows (options and aggregate intrinsic value in thousands):

A summary of activity relating to our restricted stock follows (shares in thousands):

Income tax provision for the first quarter of fiscal 2015 and 2014 was $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, and reflects expenses for foreign income taxes and state taxes. We have provided a full valuation allowance against our U.S. net deferred tax assets due to our history of net losses, difficulty in predicting future results and our conclusion that we cannot rely on projections of future taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets. Significant management judgment is required in determining our deferred tax assets and liabilities and valuation allowances for purposes of assessing our ability to realize any future benefit from our net deferred tax assets. We intend to maintain this valuation allowance until sufficient positive evidence exists to support a reversal or decrease in this allowance. Future income tax expense will be reduced to the extent that we have sufficient positive evidence to support a reversal of, or decrease in, our valuation allowance.

The following is the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share data):

The computations of diluted net income (loss) per share for the periods presented exclude the following because the effect would have been anti-dilutive:

On February 18, 2014, Crossroads Systems, Inc. (“Crossroads”) filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Quantum in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, alleging infringement of U.S. Patents 6,425,035 and 7,934,041. An amended complaint filed on April 15, 2014 also alleged infringement of U.S. patent 7,051,147. Crossroads asserts that we have incorporated Crossroads' patented technology into our StorNext QX and Q-Series lines of disk array products, and into our Scalar libraries. Crossroads seeks unspecified monetary damages and injunctive relief. Crossroads has already dismissed all claims of infringement with respect to the StorNext QX and Q-Series products. We do not believe it is reasonably possible that we will pay material damages related to this lawsuit.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements in this report usually contain the words “will,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “believe,” “project” or similar expressions and variations or negatives of these words. All such forward-looking statements including, but not limited to: (1) our goals for future operating performance including increasing revenue, having operating profit and generating cash from operations; (2) our expectation that we will continue to derive a substantial portion of our revenue from products based on tape technology; (3) our belief that our existing cash and capital resources will be sufficient to meet all currently planned expenditures, debt service and sustain our operations for at least the next 12 months; (4) our expectations regarding our ongoing efforts to control our cost structure; (5) our expectations regarding the outcome of any litigation in which we are involved and (6) our business goals, objectives, key focuses, opportunities and prospects are inherently uncertain as they are based on management’s expectations and assumptions concerning future events, and they are subject to numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, about which we speak only as of the date hereof. As a result, our actual results may differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained herein. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described herein include, but are not limited to: (1) the amount of orders received in future periods; (2) our ability to timely ship our products; (3) uncertainty regarding information technology spending and the corresponding uncertainty in the demand for our products and services; (4) our ability to maintain supplier relationships; (5) general economic, political and fiscal conditions in the U.S. and internationally; (6) our ability to successfully introduce new products; (7) our ability to capitalize on market demand; (8) our ability to achieve anticipated gross margin levels and (9) those factors discussed under “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A. Our forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. We disclaim any obligation to update information in any forward-looking statement.

We believe our combination of expertise, innovation and platform independence enables us to solve data protection and scale-out storage challenges more easily, cost-effectively and securely. We earn our revenue from the sale of products, systems and services through an array of channel partners and our sales force. Our products are sold under both the Quantum brand name and the names of various OEM customers. Our scale-out storage solutions include StorNext^® file system and archive software, StorNext appliances and Lattus^TM object storage systems and are designed to help customers manage large unstructured data sets in an information workflow, encompassing high-performance ingest, real-time collaboration, scalable processing, intelligent protection and high-value monetization. Our data protection solutions include DXi^® deduplication backup systems and Scalar^® automated tape libraries that optimize backup and recovery, simplify management and lower cost. Our vmPRO^TM virtual server backup and disaster recovery offerings protect virtual environments while minimizing the impact on servers and storage. In addition, we also offer software for cloud backup and disaster recovery of physical and virtual servers. We have a full range of services and the global scale and scope to support our worldwide customer base.

Our goal for fiscal 2015 is to profitably grow total revenue in our core business to improve operating results and shareholder value. We have undertaken several initiatives to achieve this goal, which include leveraging our market position in tape automation; penetrating growing markets where we are well positioned from a technology and go-to-market perspective with our DXi, StorNext and Lattus product lines; leveraging our large customer install base across our product portfolio to achieve efficiency and scale; focusing on vertical markets where we are strong; expanding our product portfolio; and continuing to pursue go-to-market partnerships that would drive incremental revenue and profit. In addition, we believe our current cash, balance sheet resources and line of credit availability are sufficient to pay off the $133.7 million of 3.50% convertible subordinated notes due November 15, 2015 and fund additional growth opportunities.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2015, our focus on expanding our footprint among large broadcasters in the vertical market of media and entertainment helped us achieve record quarterly revenue for scale-out storage products and services. We have created specific product combinations in our StorNext Pro Solutions as well as dedicated sales and marketing resources to this vertical market. In addition, we leveraged our install base of data center customers to sell scale-out storage solutions to manage growing media files and large content workflows for these customers. We also introduced the DXi6900, which incorporates StorNext 5 technology and is optimized for modern data protection workflows. During the quarter we pursued strategic partnerships and announced a new joint solution with a partner targeted for sporting event media and entertainment customers. In addition, in July we announced a joint solution with a strategic partner that enables customers to more easily investigate and combat cyber attacks. We believe these strategic partnership joint solutions for specific use cases can contribute incremental revenue in fiscal 2015.

In April 2014, we completed an amendment to our Wells Fargo credit agreement which increased our line of credit by $20 million to $75 million and provided additional flexibility by allowing the line of credit to be utilized to pay outstanding amounts under the November 2010 convertible subordinated notes, which are due in November 2015.

We had total revenue of $128.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2015, a $19.7 million decrease from the first quarter of fiscal 2014, primarily due to a non-recurring $15.0 million royalty received in connection with finalizing an intellectual property agreement in the first quarter of fiscal 2014. Our branded product and service revenue increased 1% from the first quarter of fiscal 2014 due to increased scale-out storage revenue mostly offset by decreased revenue from data protection products and services. Revenue from branded scale-out storage products and related services increased $5.1 million, or 40%, in the first quarter of fiscal 2015, while revenue from branded data protection products and related services decreased $4.5 million from the first quarter of fiscal 2014. Our continued focus on our branded business is reflected in the greater proportion of non-royalty revenue from branded business, at 86% in the first quarter of fiscal 2015, compared to 83% in the first quarter of fiscal 2014. Royalty revenue decreased $16.1 million from the first quarter of fiscal 2014 largely due to the $15.0 million royalty received in connection with an intellectual property agreement as noted above.

Our gross margin percentage decreased 390 basis points from the first quarter of fiscal 2014 to 43.3%, primarily due to decreased royalty revenue. Excluding the $15.0 million royalty received in connection with an intellectual property agreement in the first quarter of fiscal 2014, our gross margin percentage would have increased in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the prior year period. This is due to the improvements we made in our business model over the past year, including changing to an outsourced manufacturing model.

Operating expenses decreased $6.6 million, or 10%, primarily from cost controls and spending reductions implemented over the past year. The largest spending decrease compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2014 was for compensation and benefits as a result of reduced staffing to right-size our workforce. These cost reductions impacted sales and marketing expenses the most, followed by decreased research and development spending compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2014.

Although the $15.0 million in royalty revenue from the prior year intellectual property agreement was not repeated, our operating results declined only $7.2 million from the first quarter of fiscal 2014. We had a $1.5 million loss from operations compared to operating income of $5.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2014. Excluding the non-recurring $15.0 million royalty in the prior year, our operating results would have improved from the first quarter of fiscal 2014. We generated $6.3 million in cash from operations during the first quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to $9.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2014. We ended the quarter with $107.2 million in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, the highest quarter-end balance in over four years.

Total revenue decreased from the first quarter of fiscal 2014 primarily due to royalty revenue in the prior year that was not repeated as noted above, as well as decreased product revenue, largely due to decreased sales of OEM products. We believe decreased product revenue was due to the changing storage environment, including reduced demand for tape products and increased market demand for scale-out storage solutions, in addition to our actions related to reducing our investments in sales during fiscal 2014 while improving our sales model. OEM product and service revenue decreased $4.2 million, or 21%, from the first quarter of fiscal 2014. As noted above, combined branded product and service revenue increased slightly from the first quarter of fiscal 2014 due to increased scale-out storage revenue mostly offset by decreased revenue from data protection products and services. However, our branded product revenue decreased 2% primarily due to decreased tape automation and disk backup systems revenue, partially offset by a 25% increase in revenue from scale-out storage products. Service revenue increased $2.0 million, or 6%, primarily due to increased sales of branded hardware service contracts for our StorNext appliances. Branded scale-out storage products include StorNext software, StorNext appliances and Lattus object storage solutions. Data protection products include our tape automation systems, disk backup systems and devices and media offerings.

Total product revenue, which includes sales of our hardware and software products sold through both our Quantum branded and OEM channels, decreased $5.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2014, primarily due to decreases in revenue from sales of midrange tape automation systems. Over half of the tape automation revenue decrease was from lower midrange OEM sales and approximately one-third was attributable to decreased revenue from sales of branded midrange products. Revenue from sales of branded products decreased 2% and sales of products to our OEM customers decreased 22% in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the prior year period.

Our disk backup systems and software solutions revenue increased 6% from the first quarter of fiscal 2014 primarily due to a 25% increase in revenue from branded scale-out storage products. This was offset partially by a $1.7 million decrease in sales of branded disk backup systems. The increase in scale-out storage revenue was primarily due to increased revenue from StorNext appliances followed by Lattus object storage products. The decreased revenue from disk backup systems was largely due to lower sales of our midrange products, partially offset by increased sales of entry-level DXi products, including the DXi 4700, and enterprise disk backup products. Increased enterprise disk backup systems revenue was primarily due to increased large orders, or orders over $200,000, in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the prior year period.

Our branded tape automation business performed better in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 than our OEM tape automation systems business, declining 9% or $2.4 million, compared to a 24%, or $4.3 million, decrease in OEM tape automation revenue. OEM tape automation systems decreases were primarily due to a 30% decline in revenue from midrange systems compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2014. Within our branded tape automation systems, the decline was primarily due to midrange tape automation systems sales, which decreased 26% from the first quarter of fiscal 2014.

Product revenue from devices, which includes tape drives and removable hard drives, and non-royalty media sales was relatively unchanged.

Service revenue is primarily comprised of hardware service contracts which are typically purchased by our customers to extend the warranty or to provide faster service response time, or both. Service revenue increased 6% from the first quarter of fiscal 2014 primarily due to increased revenue from branded service contracts for our StorNext appliances.

Royalty revenue decreased from the first quarter of fiscal 2014 primarily due to the $15.0 million royalty received in connection with an intellectual property agreement in the prior year. Additionally, LTO royalties decreased as expected from the first quarter of fiscal 2014.

The 390 basis point decrease in gross margin percentage for the first quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2014 was primarily due to the $16.1 million decrease in royalty revenue. Partially offsetting this decrease was a 670 basis point increase in service margin as a result of cost reductions and a continued mix shift to more service for branded products and a reduced proportion of OEM repair service.

Product gross margin dollars decreased $1.8 million, or 7%, on a product revenue decrease of $5.7 million, or 7%, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2014; however, we maintained our product gross margin rate at 31.5% primarily due to shifting to an outsourced manufacturing model. Outsourcing our manufacturing has created a more variable cost model, reducing costs in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 that were relatively fixed in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 when we manufactured the majority of our products in our facilities. Notable cost decreases from the first quarter of fiscal 2014 as a result of implementing outsourced manufacturing include compensation and benefits and facility expenses.

Service gross margin dollars increased $3.5 million, or 21%, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2014, and service gross margin percentage increased 670 basis points on a $2.0 million increase in service revenue. The increase in service gross margin rate was primarily due to reduced costs as a result of continued improvements to our service delivery model, including outsourcing geographies with lower service and repair volumes and improving utilization of our service team. In addition, our service activities continue to reflect a larger proportion of branded products under contract, which have relatively higher margins than margins for OEM repair services.

Royalties typically do not have related cost of sales and have a 100% gross margin percentage. Therefore, royalty gross margin dollars vary directly with royalty revenue. The decrease in royalty gross margin dollars in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 was primarily due to the non-recurring $15.0 million royalty received in the first quarter of fiscal 2014.

The decrease in research and development expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2014 was primarily due to cost reductions that resulted in a $2.0 million decrease in compensation and benefits from lower staffing levels.

The decrease in sales and marketing expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2014 was primarily due to a $1.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits from decreased staffing levels. We also had a decrease of $0.8 million in marketing and advertising expense due to fewer marketing activities as a result of spending reductions.

The decrease in general and administrative expenses for the first quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2014 was primarily due to a $0.4 million decrease in facilities costs, largely from vacating portions of various facilities.

Restructuring charges in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 were primarily due to facilities costs as a result of further consolidating production and service activities. Restructuring charges in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 were primarily due to severance and benefits costs as a result of deciding to outsource our manufacturing operations and consolidate production and service activities.

The gain on sale of assets was primarily due to the sale of IP addresses in the first quarter of fiscal 2015.

Other expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 was primarily due to net foreign exchange losses compared to other income in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 largely due to net foreign exchange gains. Foreign exchange losses in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 were primarily due to strengthening of the British pound against the U.S. dollar, and foreign exchange gains in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 were primarily due to the U.S. dollar strengthening against the Australian dollar.

The income tax provision for both the first quarter of fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 reflects expenses for foreign income taxes and state taxes. We have provided a full valuation allowance against our U.S. net deferred tax assets due to our history of net losses, difficulty in predicting future results and our conclusion that we cannot rely on projections of future taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets.

Significant management judgment is required in determining our deferred tax assets and liabilities and valuation allowances for purposes of assessing our ability to realize any future benefit from our net deferred tax assets. We intend to maintain this valuation allowance until sufficient positive evidence exists to support a reversal or decrease in this allowance. Future income tax expense will be reduced to the extent that we have sufficient positive evidence to support a reversal of, or decrease in, our valuation allowance.

The following table details intangible asset amortization expense within our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (dollars in thousands):

The change in amortization expense was nominal comparing the first quarter of fiscal 2015 to the first quarter of fiscal 2014. For further information regarding amortizable intangible assets, refer to Note 5 “Intangible Assets and Goodwill.”

The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense within our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (dollars in thousands):

The decrease in share-based compensation expense was primarily due to a $0.2 million decrease in expense related to the employee stock purchase plan due to decreased employee contributions as a result of reduced staffing in fiscal 2014. Additionally, we had a decrease of $0.1 million in option expense due to existing options becoming fully vested in the first quarter of fiscal 2015.

Following is a summary of cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities (in thousands):

The $10.6 million difference between net loss and net cash provided by operating activities during the three months ended June 30, 2014 was primarily due to $8.7 million in non-cash items, the largest of which were shared-based compensation, amortization, depreciation and service parts lower of cost or market adjustment. In addition, we had an $11.1 million decrease in accounts receivable, which was offset by a $6.4 million decrease in deferred revenue. The decrease in accounts receivable was primarily due to decreased service contract invoicing in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. Deferred revenue decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred service contracts driven by seasonality.

Cash used in investing activities reflects $1.4 million of property and equipment purchases during the first quarter of fiscal 2015. Equipment purchases were primarily for engineering equipment for product development and permanent demo units.

The $5.9 million difference between net income and net cash provided by operating activities during the three months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily due to $13.0 million in non-cash items, the largest of which were service parts lower of cost or market adjustment, share-based compensation, depreciation and amortization. In addition we had a $10.7 million decrease in accounts receivable, which was offset by a $12.4 million decrease in accounts payable. The decrease in accounts receivable was primarily due to decreased sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. Accounts payable decreased due to reduced purchases in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 and timing of payments.

Cash used in investing activities reflects $1.2 million of property and equipment purchases during the first quarter of fiscal 2014. Equipment purchases were primarily for IT equipment and software, largely related to an ERP system upgrade, engineering equipment to support product development activities and permanent demo units.

We continue to focus on improving our operating performance, including efforts to increase revenue and to continue to control costs in order to improve margins, return to consistent profitability and generate positive cash flows from operating activities. We believe that our existing cash and capital resources will be sufficient to meet all currently planned expenditures, debt service, contractual obligations and sustain operations for at least the next 12 months. This belief is dependent upon our ability to achieve gross margin projections and to control operating expenses in order to provide positive cash flow from operating activities. Although we recorded facility restructuring charges in the first quarter of fiscal 2015, payments for the accrued facility restructuring will be made monthly in accordance with the lease agreements, which continue through February 2021. As a result, the facility restructuring is not expected to change our cash requirements. Our cash outlay for these lease payments could be reduced in the future if we are able to sublease facilities. Should any of the above assumptions prove incorrect, either in combination or individually, it would likely have a material negative effect on our cash balances and capital resources.

The following is a description of our existing capital resources including outstanding balances, funds available to borrow and primary repayment terms including interest rates.

We have $203.7 million of convertible subordinated debt outstanding in addition to a line of credit under a Wells Fargo credit agreement, inclusive of amendments (“WF credit agreement”). We have no outstanding balance on the line of credit. The $203.7 million of convertible subordinated debt comprises $133.7 million of 3.50% convertible subordinated notes due November 15, 2015 (“3.50% notes”) and $70 million of 4.50% convertible subordinated notes due November 15, 2017 (“4.50% notes”). Both the 3.50% notes and the 4.50% notes require semi-annual interest payments and have no early call provisions.

Under the WF credit agreement, we have the ability to borrow the lesser of $75 million or the amount of the monthly borrowing base under a senior secured revolving credit facility. The WF credit agreement matures March 29, 2017 so long as an amount sufficient to repay the 3.50% notes is available for borrowing under the WF credit agreement or is deposited in an escrow account prior to August 16, 2015. Otherwise, the WF credit agreement matures on August 16, 2015. Quarterly, we are required to pay a 0.375% commitment fee on undrawn amounts under the revolving credit facility. There is a blanket lien on all of our assets under the WF credit agreement in addition to certain financial and reporting covenants. We have letters of credit totaling $1.0 million, reducing the maximum amount available to borrow by this amount at June 30, 2014. As of June 30, 2014, and during the first quarter of fiscal 2015, we were in compliance with all covenants and had no outstanding balance on the line of credit.

Generation of positive cash flow from operating activities has historically been, and will continue to be, an important source of cash to fund operating needs and meet our current and long-term obligations. We anticipate the combination of our current cash balance and availability on the line of credit provides us with the ability to repay the 3.50% notes while maintaining sufficient cash to fund operating needs and other obligations. In addition, we plan to generate cash from operating activities in the future, which would provide us with additional operational flexibility.

We have taken many actions in recent years to respond to market conditions and improve our operating results. We cannot provide assurance that the actions we have taken in the past or any actions we may take in the future will ensure a consistent, sustainable and sufficient level of net income and positive cash flow from operating activities to fund, sustain or grow our business. Certain events that are beyond our control, including prevailing economic, competitive and industry conditions, as well as various legal and other disputes, may prevent us from achieving these financial objectives. Any inability to achieve consistent and sustainable net income and cash flow could result in:

Any of the above mentioned items, individually or in combination, could have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations, available cash and cash flows, financial condition, access to capital and liquidity.

Our discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations is based on the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these statements requires us to make significant estimates and judgments about future uncertainties that affect reported assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. In the event that estimates or assumptions prove to be different from actual results, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current information. The accounting estimates requiring our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments because these matters are inherently uncertain are unchanged. These critical accounting estimates and policies have been disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2014 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 6, 2014.

Changes in interest rates affect interest income earned on our cash equivalents, which consisted solely of money market funds during the three months ended June 30, 2014. During the first quarter of fiscal 2015, interest rates on these funds were under 1.0% and we earned negligible amounts in interest income, thus a hypothetical 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would have an insignificant impact on interest income.

We had no outstanding borrowings under the WF credit agreement and our convertible subordinated notes have a fixed interest rate, thus a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would have no impact on interest expense.

YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE RISKS DESCRIBED BELOW, TOGETHER WITH ALL OF THE OTHER INFORMATION INCLUDED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q. THE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES DESCRIBED BELOW ARE NOT THE ONLY ONES FACING QUANTUM. ADDITIONAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES NOT PRESENTLY KNOWN TO US OR THAT ARE CURRENTLY DEEMED IMMATERIAL MAY ALSO IMPAIR OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS. THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q CONTAINS “FORWARD-LOOKING” STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. PLEASE SEE “MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS” FOR ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION OF THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.

We rely on indirect sales channels to market and sell our branded products. Therefore, the loss of or deterioration in our relationship with one or more of our resellers or distributors, or our inability to establish new indirect sales channels to drive growth of our branded revenue, especially for disk systems and software solutions, could negatively affect our operating results.

We sell the majority of our branded products to value-added resellers, or VARs, and to direct marketing resellers such as CDW Corporation, who in turn sell our products to end users, and to distributors such as Ingram Micro, Inc. and others. The success of these sales channels is hard to predict, particularly over time, and we have no purchase commitments or long-term orders from them that assure us of any baseline sales through these channels. Several of our resellers carry competing product lines that they may promote over our products. A reseller might not continue to purchase our products or market them effectively, and each reseller determines the type and amount of our products that it will purchase from us and the pricing of the products that it sells to end user customers. Establishing new indirect sales channels is an important part of our strategy to drive growth of our branded revenue.

As we introduce new products and solutions, we could negatively impact our relationship with channel partners that historically have sold other products and solutions that now compete with our new offerings. For example, we introduced various StorNext appliance solutions beginning in fiscal 2012 causing us to more directly compete for hardware sales with channel partners that sold other hardware products in conjunction with our StorNext software.

Certain of our contracts with customers contain “most favored nation” pricing provisions mandating that we offer our products to these customers at the lowest price offered to other similarly situated customers. In addition, sales of our enterprise products, and the revenue associated with the on-site service of those products, are somewhat concentrated in specific customers, including government agencies and government-related companies. Any failure of such customers and agencies to continue purchasing products in the same quantities and in the same time frames as they have in the past could affect our operation results. Our operating results could be adversely affected by any number of factors including:

We derive the majority of our revenue from products incorporating tape technology. Our future operating results depend in part on continued market acceptance and use of products employing tape technology and decreases in the market could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and operating results. In addition, if we are unable to compete with new or alternative storage technologies, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

We derive the majority of our revenue from products that incorporate some form of tape technology and we expect to continue to derive significant revenue from these products in the next several years. As a result, our future operating results depend in part on continued market acceptance and use of products employing tape technology. The use of products employing tape technology has been decreasing and is projected to continue to decrease. Decreased market acceptance or use of products employing tape technology has materially and adversely impacted our business, financial condition and operating results and could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and operating results in the future.

Disk products as well as various software solutions and alternative technologies continue to gain broader market acceptance. We face risks that our tape customers migrate toward these products and solutions. We are addressing this risk through our own targeted investment in disk systems and other alternative technologies; however, these markets are characterized by rapid innovation, evolving customer demands and strong competition, including competition with several companies who are also significant customers. If we are not successful in our efforts, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

If our products fail to meet our or our customers’ specifications for quality and reliability, we may face liability and reputational or financial harm which may adversely impact our results of operations and our competitive position may suffer.

Although we place great emphasis on product quality, we may from time to time experience problems with the performance of our products, which could result in one or more of the following:

These factors could cause our business, financial condition and results of operations to be materially and adversely affected.

In addition, we face potential liability for performance problems of our products because our end users employ our storage technologies for the storage and backup of important data and to satisfy regulatory requirements. Although we maintain technology errors and omissions liability insurance, our insurance may not cover potential claims of this type or may not be adequate to indemnify us for all liability that may be imposed. Any imposition of liability or litigation costs that is not covered by insurance or is in excess of our insurance coverage could harm our business. In addition, we could potentially face claims for product liability from our customers if our products cause property damage or bodily injury. Although we maintain general liability insurance, our insurance may not cover potential claims of this type or may not be adequate to indemnify us for all liability that may be imposed. Any imposition of liability or litigation costs that is not covered by insurance or is in excess of our insurance coverage could harm our business.

A large percentage of our sales come from a few customers, some of which are also competitors, and these customers generally have no minimum or long-term purchase commitments. The loss of, or a significant reduction in demand from, one or more key customers could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Our sales have been and continue to be concentrated among a few customers because under our business model, we sell to OEMs, distributors, VARs and DMRs to reach end user customers. Furthermore, customers are not obligated to purchase any minimum product volume and our relationships with customers are terminable at will. Revenue from OEM customers has decreased in recent years. If we experience further declines in revenue from OEM customers or any of our other large customers, we could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, certain of our large customers are also our competitors, and such customers could decide to reduce or terminate their purchases of our products for competitive reasons.

Some of our tape and disk products are incorporated into larger storage systems or solutions that are marketed and sold to end users by large OEM customers as well as VARs, channel partners and other distributors. Because of this, we have limited market access to these end users, limiting our ability to reach and influence their purchasing decisions. These market conditions further our reliance on these OEM and other large customers such as distributors and VARs. Thus if they were to significantly reduce, cancel or delay their orders with us, our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

A portion of our sales are to various agencies and departments of the U.S. federal government, and funding cuts to federal spending can adversely impact our revenue. In fiscal 2014, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 implemented automatic spending cuts beginning March 1, 2013. Between October 1 and October 16, 2013, the U.S. government partial shutdown caused reductions, cancellations and delayed orders. Future spending cuts by the U.S. federal government could decrease revenue from sales to the federal government that could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

Our operating results depend on a limited number of products and on new product introductions, which may not be successful, in which case our business, financial condition and operating results may be materially and adversely affected.

A limited number of products comprise a significant majority of our sales, and due to rapid technological change in the industry, our future operating results depend on our ability to develop and successfully introduce new products. To compete effectively, we must continually improve existing products and introduce new ones. We have devoted and expect to continue to devote considerable management and financial resources to these efforts. We cannot provide assurance that:

If we are not successful in timely completion of our new product qualifications and then ramping sales to our key customers, our revenue and results of operations could be adversely impacted. In addition, if the quality of our products is not acceptable to our customers, this could result in customer dissatisfaction, lost revenue and increased warranty and repair costs.

We continue to face risks related to economic uncertainty and slow economic growth.

Uncertainty about economic conditions poses a risk as businesses may further reduce or postpone spending in response to reduced budgets, tightening of credit markets, negative financial news and declines in income or asset values which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The slow economic growth in recent years along with periods of economic uncertainty in various countries around the world has had a material and adverse impact on our business and our financial condition.

In particular, we have experienced reduced demand for IT products and services overall and more specifically for products with tape technology in the data protection market. We continue to face risks related to economic conditions in Europe, including concerns about sovereign debt and related political matters, which could negatively impact the U.S. and global economies and adversely affect our financial results. In addition, our ability to access capital markets may be restricted which could have an impact on our ability to react to changing economic and business conditions and could also adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Competition may intensify in the data protection market as a result of competitors introducing products based on new technology standards and merger and acquisition activity, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our competitors in the data protection market for disk systems and virtual machine solutions are aggressively trying to advance and develop new technologies and products to compete against our technologies and products, and we face the risk that customers could choose competitor products over ours. Competition in our markets is characterized by technological innovation and advancement. As a result of competition and new technology standards, our sales or gross margins could decline, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Technological developments and competition over the years in the tape automation market has resulted in decreased prices for tape automation products and product offerings. Pricing pressure is more pronounced in the tape automation market for entry-level products and least pronounced for enterprise products. Over time, the prices of our products and competitor products have decreased, but such products often incorporate new and/or different features and technologies than prior years. We face risks that customers could choose competitor products over ours due to these features and technologies or due to pricing differences. We have managed pricing pressure by reducing production costs and/or adding features to increase value to maintain a certain level of gross margin for our tape automation systems. However, certain of our costs are fixed in the short term, so we may not be able to offset price decreases or reductions in demand sufficiently to maintain our profitability. In addition, if competition further intensifies, or if there is additional industry consolidation, our sales and gross margins for tape automation systems could decline, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Industry consolidation and competing technologies with device products, which include tape drives and removable hard drives, have resulted in decreased prices and increasingly commoditized device products. Our response has been to manage our device business at the material margin level and we have chosen not to compete for sales in intense price-based situations or if we would be unable to maintain a certain gross margin level. Our focus has shifted to higher margin opportunities in other product lines. Although revenue from devices has decreased in recent years, our material margins have remained relatively stable over this period. We have exited certain portions of the device market and have anticipated decreased sales of devices. We face risk of reduced shipments of our devices beyond our plans, and could have reduced margins on these products, which could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Additionally, the competitive landscape could change due to merger and acquisition activity in the data protection market. Such transactions may impact us in a number of ways. For instance, they could result in:

These transactions also create uncertainty and disruption in the market because whether a pending transaction will be completed, the timing of such a transaction and its degree of impact are often unknown. Given these factors and others, such merger and acquisition activity may materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Competition may intensify in the scale-out storage market as a result of competitors introducing products based on new technology standards and market consolidation, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Competition in the scale-out storage market is characterized by technological innovation and advancement, including performance and scale features, and our competitors are aggressively trying to advance and develop new technologies and solutions. If we are unable to compete effectively in these markets and develop solutions that have features and technologies that our customers desire, including new technology standards, our sales from software solutions and appliances could decline, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Additionally, the competitive landscape could change due to mergers and acquisitions among our competitors, customers and partners. Transactions such as these may impact us in a number of ways. For instance, they could result in:

These transactions also create uncertainty and disruption in the market, because whether a pending transaction will be completed, the timing of such a transaction and its degree of impact are often unknown. Given these factors and others, such merger and acquisition activity may materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A significant decline in media royalty, branded software or OEM deduplication software revenues could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Our media royalties, branded software and OEM deduplication software revenues are relatively profitable and can significantly impact total company profitability. We receive media royalty revenue based on tape media cartridges sold by various tape media manufacturers and resellers. Under our license agreements with these companies, each of the licensees determines the pricing and number of units of tape media cartridges that it sells. Our media royalty revenue varies depending on the level of sales of the various media cartridge offerings sold by the licensees and other factors, including:

Our media royalties depend on royalty rates and the quantity of media consumed in the market. We do not control licensee sales of these tape media cartridges. Reduced royalty rates, or a reduced installed device base using tape media cartridges, would result in further reductions in our media royalty revenue and could reduce gross margins. This could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our branded software revenues are also dependent on many factors, including the success of competitive offerings, our ability to execute on our product roadmap and our effectiveness at marketing and selling our branded software solutions directly or through our channel partners. Disruptions to any one of these factors could reduce our branded software revenues, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Our OEM deduplication software revenues also depend on many factors, including the success of competitive offerings, our ability to execute on our product roadmap with our OEM deduplication software partners, the effort of our OEM deduplication software partners in marketing and selling the resulting products, the market acceptance of the resulting products and changes in the competitive landscape, including the impact of acquisitions. At various times, we had significant revenue from OEM deduplication software revenue and at times we had negligible revenue from OEM deduplication software, which negatively impacted our results. Any further disruptions to the factors on which our OEM deduplication software revenues depends could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Some of our products contain licensed, third-party technology that provides important product functionality and features. The loss or inability to obtain any such license could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our products may contain technology licensed from third parties that provides important product functionality and features. For example, our Lattus product family contains technology licensed from a private, international company. We have contractual protections within our license agreements to help mitigate against the risks of incorporating third-party technology into our products. However, there remains a risk that we may not have continued access to this technology, for instance if the licensing company ceased to exist, either from bankruptcy, dissolution or purchase by a competitor. In addition, legal actions, such as intellectual property actions, brought against the licensing company could impact our future access to the technology. We also have limited control of the technology roadmap and cannot ensure that the licensing company will advance the roadmap of the licensed technology in the manner best for Quantum. Any of these actions could negatively impact our technology licensing, thereby reducing the functionality and/or features of our products, and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. We also face the risk of not being able to quickly implement a replacement technology or otherwise mitigating the risks associated with not having access to this licensed technology, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

We have taken considerable steps towards reducing our cost structure and may take further cost reduction actions. The steps we have taken and may take in the future may not reduce our cost structure to a level appropriate in relation to our future sales and therefore, these anticipated cost reductions may be insufficient to result in consistent profitability.

In the last several years, we have recorded significant restructuring charges and made cash payments in order to reduce our cost of sales and operating expenses to respond to adverse economic and industry conditions, from strategic management decisions and to rationalize our operations following acquisitions. These restructurings may result in decreases to our revenues or adversely affect our ability to grow our business in the future. We may take future steps to further reduce our operating costs, including future cost reduction steps or restructurings in response to strategic decisions, adverse changes in our business or industry or future acquisitions. We may be unable to reduce our cost of sales and operating expenses at a rate and to a level appropriate in relation to our future sales, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

If we are unable to attract and retain skilled employees, our business could be adversely impacted.

We may be subject to increased turnover in our employee base or the inability to fill open headcount requisitions due to competition, concerns about our operational performance or other factors. In addition, we may rely on the performance of employees whose skill sets are not sufficiently developed to fulfill their expected job responsibilities. Either of these situations could impair or delay our ability to realize operational and strategic objectives and cause increased expenses and lost sales opportunities.

Additionally, over the last several years, we made certain changes in strategic direction focusing on key technology segments. As part of this change in focus, we reduced costs of revenue and other operating expenses. Executing on this new strategic direction as well as the ongoing efficiency initiatives across the company could adversely affect our ability to retain and hire key personnel and may result in reduced productivity by our employees.

The loss of the services of any of our key employees, the inability to attract or retain qualified talent in the future, or delays in hiring required talent, particularly sales and engineering talent, could delay the development and introduction of our products or services and/or negatively affect our ability to sell our products or services.

Economic or other business factors may lead us to write down the carrying amount of our goodwill or long-lived assets, which could have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations.

We evaluate our goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year, or more frequently when indicators of impairment are present. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate impairment might exist. We continue to monitor relevant market and economic conditions, including the price of our stock, and perform appropriate impairment reviews when conditions deteriorate such that we believe the value of our goodwill could be further impaired or an impairment exists in our long-lived assets. It is possible that conditions could deteriorate due to economic or other factors that affect our business, resulting in the need to write down the carrying amount of our goodwill or long-lived assets to fair value at the time of such assessment. For example, in fiscal 2009, we had a goodwill impairment charge of $339 million. As a result of any impairment charge, our operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

Third party intellectual property infringement claims could result in substantial liability and significant costs, and, as a result, our business, financial condition and operating results may be materially and adversely affected.

From time to time, third parties allege our infringement of and need for a license under their patented or other proprietary technology, such as our current litigation with Crossroads Systems, Inc. described in Legal Proceedings. While we currently believe the amount of ultimate liability, if any, with respect to any such actions will not materially affect our financial position, results of operations or liquidity, the ultimate outcome of any license discussion or litigation is uncertain. Adverse resolution of any third party infringement claim could subject us to substantial liabilities and require us to refrain from manufacturing and selling certain products. In addition, the costs incurred in intellectual property litigation can be substantial, regardless of the outcome. As a result, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

In addition, certain products or technologies acquired or developed by us may include “open source” software. Open source software is typically licensed for use at no initial charge. Certain open source software licenses, however, require users of the open source software to license to others any software that is based on, incorporates or interacts with, the open source software under the terms of the open source license. Although we endeavor to comply fully with such requirements, third parties could claim that we are required to license larger portions of our software than we believe we are required to license under open source software licenses. If such claims were successful, they could adversely impact our competitive position and financial results by providing our competitors with access to sensitive information that may help them develop competitive products. In addition, our use of open source software may harm our business and subject us to intellectual property claims, litigation or proceedings in the future because:

As a result of our global manufacturing and sales operations, we are subject to a variety of risks related to our business outside of the U.S., any of which could, individually or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on our business.

A significant portion of our manufacturing and sales operations and supply chain occurs in countries other than the U.S. We also have sales outside the U.S. We utilize contract manufacturers to produce and fulfill orders for our products and have suppliers for various components, several of which have operations located in foreign countries including China, Hungary, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand. Because of these operations, we are subject to a number of risks including:

Our quarterly operating results could fluctuate significantly, and past quarterly operating results should not be used to predict future performance.

Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past and could fluctuate significantly in the future. As a result, our quarterly operating results should not be used to predict future performance. Quarterly operating results could be materially and adversely affected by a number of factors, including, but not limited to:

If we fail to meet our projected quarterly results, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

If we fail to protect our intellectual property or if others use our proprietary technology without authorization, our competitive position may suffer.

Our future success and ability to compete depends in part on our proprietary technology. We rely on a combination of copyright, patent, trademark, and trade secrets laws and nondisclosure agreements to establish and protect our proprietary technology. However, we cannot provide assurance that patents will be issued with respect to pending or future patent applications that we have filed or plan to file or that our patents will be upheld as valid or will prevent the development of competitive products or that any actions we have taken will adequately protect our intellectual property rights. We generally enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, customers, potential customers, contract manufacturers and others as required, in which we strictly limit access to, and distribution of, our software, and further limit the disclosure and use of our proprietary information.

Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain or use our products or technology. Enforcing our intellectual property rights can sometimes only be accomplished through the use of litigation. Our competitors may also independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technology. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S.

Because we may order components from suppliers in advance of receipt of customer orders for our products that include these components, we could face a material inventory risk if we fail to accurately forecast demand for our products or manage production, which could have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows.

Although we use third parties to manufacture most of our products, in some cases we may retain the responsibility to purchase component inventory to support third party manufacturing activities, which presents a number of risks that could materially and adversely affect our financial condition. For instance, as part of our component planning, we may place orders with or pay certain suppliers for components in advance of receipt of customer orders. We may occasionally enter into negotiated orders with vendors early in the manufacturing process of our products to ensure that we have sufficient components for our products to meet anticipated customer demand. Because the design and manufacturing process for these components can be complicated, it is possible that we could experience a design or manufacturing flaw that could delay or even prevent the production of the components for which we previously committed to pay. We also face the risk of ordering too many components, or conversely, not enough components, since supply orders are generally based on forecasts of customer orders rather than actual customer orders. In addition, in some cases, we may make non-cancelable order commitments to our suppliers for work-in-progress, supplier’s finished goods, custom sub-assemblies, discontinued (end-of-life) components and Quantum-unique raw materials that are necessary to meet our lead times for finished goods. If we cannot change or be released from supply orders, we could incur costs from the purchase of unusable components, either due to a delay in the production of the components or other supplies or as a result of inaccurately predicting supply orders in advance of customer orders. These same risks exist with our third party contract manufacturing partners. Our business and operating results could be materially and adversely affected if we incur increased costs, or are unable to fulfill customer orders.

Our manufacturing, component production and service repair are outsourced to third party contract manufacturers, component suppliers and service providers. If we cannot obtain products, parts and services from these third parties in a cost effective and timely manner that meets our customers’ expectations, this could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Many aspects of our supply chain and operational results are dependent on the performance of third party business partners. We increased the use of third party contract manufacturers, service providers and/or product integrators in fiscal 2014. We face a number of risks as a result of these relationships, including, among others:

Any or all of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business. In the past we have successfully transitioned products or component supply from one supplier or manufacturing location to another without significant financial or operational impact, but there is no guarantee of our continued ability to do so.

If we do not successfully manage the changes that we have made and may continue to make to our infrastructure and management, our business could be disrupted, and that could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

Managing change is an important focus for us. In recent years, we have implemented several significant initiatives involving our sales and marketing, engineering and operations organizations, aimed at increasing our efficiency and better aligning these groups with our corporate strategy. In addition, we have reduced headcount to streamline and consolidate our supporting functions as appropriate in response to market or competitive conditions and following past acquisitions and are increasing our reliance on certain third party business relationships. Our inability to successfully manage the changes that we implement, and detect and address issues as they arise could disrupt our business and adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

Because we rely heavily on distributors and other resellers to market and sell our products, if one or more distributors were to experience a significant deterioration in its financial condition or its relationship with us, this could disrupt the distribution of our products and reduce our revenue, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

In certain product and geographic segments we heavily utilize distributors and value added resellers to perform the functions necessary to market and sell our products. To fulfill this role, the distributor must maintain an acceptable level of financial stability, creditworthiness and the ability to successfully manage business relationships with the customers it serves directly. Under our distributor agreements with these companies, each of the distributors determines the type and amount of our products that it will purchase from us and the pricing of the products that it sells to its customers. If the distributor is unable to perform in an acceptable manner, we may be required to reduce the amount of sales of our product to the distributor or terminate the relationship. We may also incur financial losses for product returns from distributors or for the failure or refusal of distributors to pay obligations owed to us. Either scenario could result in fewer of our products being available to the affected market segments, reduced levels of customer satisfaction and/or increased expenses, which could in turn have a material and adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We have significant indebtedness, which imposes upon us debt service obligations, and our credit facility contains various operating and financial covenants that limit our discretion in the operation of our business. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to meet these debt obligations or remain in compliance with the covenants, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

Our level of indebtedness presents risks to investors, both in terms of the constraints that it places on our ability to operate our business and because of the possibility that we may not generate sufficient cash to pay the principal and interest on our indebtedness as it becomes due. For a description of our outstanding debt, see Liquidity and Capital Resources in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Our credit facility agreement contains restrictive covenants that require us to comply with and maintain certain financial tests and ratios, as well as restrict our ability, subject to certain thresholds, to:

Our ability to comply with covenants contained in this credit agreement may be affected by events beyond our control, including prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions.

Our credit facility agreement is collateralized by a pledge of all of our assets. If we were to default and were unable to obtain a waiver for such a default, the lender would have a right to foreclose on our assets in order to satisfy our obligations under the credit agreement. Any such action on the part of the lender against us could have a materially adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our stock price could become more volatile if certain institutional investors were to increase or decrease the number of shares they own. In addition, there are other factors and events that could affect the trading prices of our common stock.

A small number of institutional investors have owned a significant portion of our common stock at various times in recent years. If any or all of these investors were to decide to purchase significant additional shares or to sell significant amounts or all of the common shares they currently own, or if there is a perception that those sales may occur, that may cause our stock price to be more volatile. For example, there have been instances in the past where a shareholder with a significant equity position began to sell shares, putting downward pressure on our stock price for the duration of their selling activity. In these situations, selling pressure outweighed buying demand and our stock price declined. This situation has occurred due to our stock price falling below institutional investors’ price thresholds and our volatility increasing beyond investors’ volatility parameters causing even greater selling pressure.

Trading prices of our common stock may fluctuate in response to a number of other events and factors, such as:

Any of these events and factors may cause our stock price to rise or fall and may adversely affect our business and financing opportunities.

Our design processes are subject to safety and environmental regulations which could lead to increased costs, or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to a variety of laws and regulations relating to, among other things, the use, storage, discharge and disposal of materials and substances used in our facilities as well as the safety of our employees and the public. Current regulations in the U.S. and various international jurisdictions restrict the use of certain potentially hazardous materials used in electronic products and components (including lead and some flame retardants) impose a “take back” obligation on manufacturers for the financing of the collection, recovery and disposal of electrical and electronic equipment and require extensive investigation into and disclosure regarding certain minerals used in our supply chain. We have implemented procedures and will likely continue to introduce new processes to comply with current and future safety and environmental legislation. However, measures taken now or in the future to comply with such legislation may adversely affect our personnel costs or product sales by requiring us to acquire costly equipment or materials, redesign processes or to incur other significant expenses in adapting our waste disposal and emission management processes. Furthermore, safety or environmental claims or our failure to comply with present or future regulations could result in the assessment of damages or imposition of fines against us, or the suspension of affected operations, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to many laws and regulations, and violation of or changes in those requirements could materially and adversely affect our business.

We are subject to numerous U.S. and international laws regarding corporate conduct, fair competition, preventing corruption and import and export practices, including requirements applicable to U.S. government contractors. In addition, the SEC has adopted disclosure rules related to the supply of certain minerals originating from the conflict zones of the Democratic Republic of Congo or adjoining countries, and we may incur costs to comply with such regulations and may realize other costs relating to the sourcing and availability of minerals used in our products. While we maintain a rigorous corporate ethics and compliance program, we may be subject to increased regulatory scrutiny, significant monetary fines or penalties, suspension of business opportunities or loss of jurisdictional operating rights as a result of any failure to comply with those requirements. We may also be exposed to potential liability resulting from our business partners’ violation of these requirements. If we were to be subject to a compliance investigation, we may incur increased personnel and legal costs. Further, our U.S. and international business models are based on currently applicable regulatory requirements and exceptions. Changes in those requirements or exceptions could necessitate changes to our business model. Any of these consequences could materially and adversely impact our business and operating results.

We face potential liability for performance problems of our products because our end users employ our storage technologies for the storage and backup of important data and to satisfy regulatory requirements. Although we maintain technology errors and omissions liability insurance, our insurance may not cover potential claims of this type or may not be adequate to indemnify us for all liability that may be imposed. Any imposition of liability or accrual of litigation costs that is not covered by insurance or is in excess of our insurance coverage could harm our business. In addition, we could potentially face claims for product liability from our customers if our products cause property damage or bodily injury. Although we maintain general liability insurance, our insurance may not cover potential claims of this type or may not be adequate to indemnify us for all liability that may be imposed. Any imposition of liability or accrual of litigation costs that is not covered by insurance or is in excess of our insurance coverage could harm our business.

We must maintain appropriate levels of service parts inventories. If we do not have sufficient service parts inventories, we may experience increased levels of customer dissatisfaction. If we hold excessive service parts inventories, we may incur financial losses.

We maintain levels of service parts inventories to satisfy future warranty obligations and also to earn service revenue by providing enhanced and extended warranty and repair service during and beyond the warranty period. We estimate the required amount of service parts inventories based on historical usage and forecasts of future warranty and extended warranty requirements, including estimates of failure rates and costs to repair, and out of warranty revenue. Given the significant levels of judgment inherently involved in the process, we cannot provide assurance that we will be able to maintain appropriate levels of service parts inventories to satisfy customer needs and to avoid financial losses from excess service parts inventories. If we are unable to maintain appropriate levels of service parts inventories, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely impacted.

From time to time we have made acquisitions. The failure to successfully integrate future acquisitions could harm our business, financial condition and operating results.

As a part of our business strategy, we have in the past and may make acquisitions in the future, subject to certain debt covenants. We may also make significant investments in complementary companies, products or technologies. If we fail to successfully integrate such acquisitions or significant investments, it could harm our business, financial condition and operating results. Risks that we may face in our efforts to integrate any recent or future acquisitions include, among others:

Acquisitions present many risks, and we may not realize the financial and strategic goals that were contemplated at the time of any transaction. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to successfully integrate any business, products, technologies or personnel that we may acquire in the future, and our failure to do so could negatively impact our business, financial condition and operating results.

If the average closing price of our common stock were to drop below $1.00 per share over a consecutive thirty trading-day period, we would be out of compliance with NYSE Euronext (“NYSE”) rules, and our common stock could be delisted from trading on the NYSE, which could materially and adversely impair the liquidity and value of our common stock.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2015, the closing price of our common stock ranged between a low of $0.99 on May 7, 2014 and a high of $1.22 on various dates including June 30, 2014. If the average closing price of our common stock does not exceed $1.00 per share over a consecutive thirty trading-day period, we would be non-compliant with NYSE continued listing standards. Once notified of such non-compliance by the NYSE, we would need to bring our share price and consecutive thirty trading-day average share price back above $1.00 per share within six months or the NYSE would commence suspension and delisting procedures. In addition, if our common stock price falls below the $1.00 threshold to the point where the NYSE considers the stock price to be “abnormally low,” the NYSE has the discretion to begin delisting proceeding immediately with respect to our common stock. There is no formal definition of “abnormally low” in the NYSE rules. If our common stock were delisted, the ability of our stockholders to sell any of our common stock at all would be severely, if not completely, limited, causing our stock price to decline further.

If the future outcomes related to the estimates used in recording tax liabilities to various taxing authorities result in higher tax liabilities than estimated, then we would have to record tax charges, which could be material.

We have provided amounts and recorded liabilities for probable and estimable tax adjustments that may be proposed by various taxing authorities in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions. If events occur that indicate payments of these amounts will be less than estimated then reversals of these liabilities would create tax benefits recognized in the periods when we determine the liabilities have reduced. Conversely, if events occur which indicate that payments of these amounts will be greater than estimated, then tax charges and additional liabilities would be recorded. In particular, various foreign jurisdictions could challenge the characterization or transfer pricing of certain intercompany transactions. In the event of an unfavorable outcome of such challenge, there exists the possibility of a material tax charge and adverse impact on the results of operations in the period in which the matter is resolved or an unfavorable outcome becomes probable and estimable.

Certain changes in stock ownership could result in a limitation on the amount of net operating loss and tax credit carryovers that can be utilized each year. Should we undergo such a change in stock ownership, it would severely limit the usage of these carryover tax attributes against future income, resulting in additional tax charges, which could be material.

We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, and an adverse change in foreign currency exchange rates relative to our position in such currencies could have a materially adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We do not currently use derivative financial instruments for foreign currency hedging or speculative purposes. We have used in the past, and may use in the future, foreign currency forward contracts to hedge our exposure to foreign currency exchange rates. To the extent that we have assets or liabilities denominated in a foreign currency that are inadequately hedged or not hedged at all, we may be subject to foreign currency losses, which could be significant.

Our international operations can act as a natural hedge when both operating expenses and sales are denominated in local currencies. In these instances, although an unfavorable change in the exchange rate of a foreign currency against the U.S. dollar would result in lower sales when translated to U.S. dollars, operating expenses would also be lower in these circumstances. An increase in the rate at which a foreign currency is exchanged for U.S. dollars would require more of that particular foreign currency to equal a specified amount of U.S. dollars than before such rate increase. In such cases, and if we were to price our products and services in that particular foreign currency, we would receive fewer U.S. dollars than we would have received prior to such rate increase for the foreign currency. Likewise, if we were to price our products and services in U.S. dollars while competitors priced their products in a local currency, an increase in the relative strength of the U.S. dollar would result in our prices being uncompetitive in those markets. Such fluctuations in currency exchange rates could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Pursuant to a settlement agreement we entered into with respect to the potential proxy contest for the election of directors at our 2014 annual meeting, our failure to achieve certain operating metrics could result in a change in our Board of Directors and may constitute a change of control under certain contracts with third parties.

In connection with a potential proxy contest related to the election of directors to the Board of Directors (“Board”) at the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders (“2014 Annual Meeting”), we entered into a settlement agreement (“Settlement Agreement”) with Starboard Value LP and certain of its affiliates (“Starboard”). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, we have agreed to nominate four candidates proposed by Starboard for election at our 2014 Annual Meeting. In addition, if we do not achieve certain objectives under our fiscal 2015 business plan previously agreed between Quantum and Starboard, then Starboard will be entitled to nominate two additional directors to the Board as of the first business day following the date that we fail to achieve any of the agreed business plan objectives, which will be determined as of the date we publicly announce earnings results for the applicable period. If Starboard exercises this right, we will increase the size of the Board by two directors, and Starboard will propose two candidates, each of whom will be appointed to the Board within ten business days of being proposed, so long as such candidate qualifies as “independent” pursuant to NYSE listing standards and does not otherwise have any material conflicts with Quantum or its businesses. These rights expire in certain circumstances.

Under certain circumstances, a change in a majority of the Board may result in a change of control under the severance and change of control agreements we have with our management. Pursuant to the severance and change in control agreements, certain severance payments may be triggered following a change of control, but only upon there being a qualifying termination that occurs within twelve months of any such change of control. A change in a majority of the Board may also result in a change of control under certain contracts with third parties, including our directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and our Wells Fargo credit agreement, if we are unable to secure appropriate waivers or amendments to any such contracts. The occurrence of any of the foregoing events could adversely affect our business.

The Exhibit Index beginning on page 34 of this report sets forth a list of exhibits and is hereby incorporated by reference.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

x		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

		For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014

OR

¨		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

		For the transition period from _______ to _______

		Page Number
	PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements:
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets		1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations		2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)		3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		4
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		12
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		20
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		20
	PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		20
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		20
Item 6.	Exhibits		32
	SIGNATURE		33
	EXHIBIT INDEX		34

	June 30, 2014			March 31, 2014
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	104,464		$	99,125
Restricted cash		2,755			2,760
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $111 and $88, respectively		90,465			101,605
Manufacturing inventories		33,122			34,815
Service parts inventories		24,787			25,629
Other current assets		10,879			10,161
Total current assets		266,472			274,095

Long-term assets:
Property and equipment, less accumulated depreciation		17,262			17,574
Intangible assets, less accumulated amortization		1,677			3,911
Goodwill		55,613			55,613
Other long-term assets		10,192			10,605
Total long-term assets		84,744			87,703
	$	351,216		$	361,798
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	38,780		$	41,792
Accrued warranty		5,898			6,116
Deferred revenue, current		93,426			98,098
Accrued restructuring charges, current		3,419			4,345
Accrued compensation		26,559			25,036
Other accrued liabilities		15,259			15,168
Total current liabilities		183,341			190,555

Long-term liabilities:
Deferred revenue, long-term		38,280			40,054
Accrued restructuring charges, long-term		4,047			4,023
Convertible subordinated debt		203,735			203,735
Other long-term liabilities		10,407			10,831
Total long-term liabilities		256,469			258,643

Stockholders’ deficit:
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; 250,810 and 250,410 shares
issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and March 31, 2014, respectively		2,508			2,504
Capital in excess of par		446,606			443,547
Accumulated deficit		(544,395	)		(540,071	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		6,687			6,620
Total stockholders’ deficit		(88,594	)		(87,400	)
	$	351,216		$	361,798

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(4,324	)	$	3,281
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		2,198			2,872
Amortization of intangible assets		2,234			2,224
Amortization of debt issuance costs		411			409
Service parts lower of cost or market adjustment		1,154			4,028
Gain on sale of assets		(462	)		—
Deferred income taxes		(77	)		128
Share-based compensation		3,068			3,356
Other non-cash		(259	)		—
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		11,140			10,699
Manufacturing inventories		597			337
Service parts inventories		(63	)		913
Accounts payable		(3,010	)		(12,372	)
Accrued warranty		(218	)		(505	)
Deferred revenue		(6,446	)		(2,169	)
Accrued restructuring charges		(927	)		1,026
Accrued compensation		1,549			(2,370	)
Other assets and liabilities		(291	)		(2,684	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		6,274			9,173

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(1,371	)		(1,230	)
Proceeds from sale of assets		462			—
Increase in restricted cash		(20	)		(37	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(929	)		(1,267	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Payment of taxes due upon vesting of restricted stock		(119	)		(203	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		114			60
Net cash used in financing activities		(5	)		(143	)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(1	)		(8	)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		5,339			7,755
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		99,125			68,976
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	104,464		$	76,731
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Purchases of property and equipment included in accounts payable	$	302		$	746

	As of
	June 30, 2014		March 31, 2014
Money market funds	$	77,090	$	93,077

			Goodwill			Accumulated Impairment Losses				Net Amount
	Balance		$	394,613		$	(339,000	)		$	55,613

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
	Severance and Benefits			Facilities			Other			Total
Balance as of March 31, 2014	$	1,574		$	6,724		$	70		$	8,368
Restructuring costs		266			727			13			1,006
Restructuring charge reversal		(141	)		—			—			(141	)
Cash payments		(1,201	)		(795	)		(30	)		(2,026	)
Other non-cash		—			259			—			259
Balance as of June 30, 2014	$	498		$	6,915		$	53		$	7,466

	As of June 30, 2014
	Severance and Benefits		Facilities		Other		Total
Estimated timing of future payouts:
Next twelve months	$	350	$	3,016	$	53	$	3,419
July 2015 through February 2021		148		3,899		—		4,047
	$	498	$	6,915	$	53	$	7,466

	Options		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding as of March 31, 2014	7,997		$	1.78
Exercised	(134	)		0.85
Forfeited	(58	)		1.39
Expired	(1,223	)		2.95
Outstanding as of June 30, 2014	6,582		$	1.58	2.14	$	949
Vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2014	6,572		$	1.58	2.14	$	949
Exercisable as of June 30, 2014	6,311		$	1.54	2.08	$	949

	Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested at March 31, 2014	12,108		$	1.80
Granted	299			1.21
Vested	(365	)		1.87
Forfeited	(128	)		1.80
Nonvested at June 30, 2014	11,914		$	1.78

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)
	June 30, 2014		% of revenue		June 30, 2013		% of revenue		Change			% Change
Product revenue	$	80,194	62.6	%	$	85,849	58.1	%	$	(5,655	)	(6.6	)%
Service revenue		38,500	30.0	%		36,492	24.7	%		2,008		5.5	%
Royalty revenue		9,434	7.4	%		25,508	17.2	%		(16,074	)	(63.0	)%
Total revenue	$	128,128	100.0	%	$	147,849	100.0	%	$	(19,721	)	(13.3	)%

(i)	Restrictions on our ability to manage or fund our existing operations, which could result in a material and adverse effect on our future results of operations and financial condition.

(ii)	Unwillingness on the part of the lenders to do any of the following:

	Provide a waiver or amendment for any covenant violations we may experience in future periods, thereby triggering a default under, or termination of, the revolving credit line, or Approve any amendments to the credit agreement we may seek to obtain in the future.

	Any lack of renewal, waiver, or amendment, if needed, could result in the revolving credit line becoming unavailable to us and any amounts outstanding becoming immediately due and payable.

(iii)	Further impairment of our financial flexibility, which could require us to raise additional funding in the capital markets sooner than we otherwise would, and on terms less favorable to us, if available at all.

(a)	Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. We evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This control evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our CEO and our CFO. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC. Disclosure controls are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on the controls evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our disclosure controls were effective.

(b)	Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Exhibit Number		Exhibit Description
	31.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. ‡
	31.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. ‡
	32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002. †
	32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002. †
	101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.
	101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
	101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
	101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
	101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
	101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

	As of
	June 30, 2014							March 31, 2014
	Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Amount		Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Amount
Purchased technology	$	179,475	$	(178,726	)	$	749	$	179,475	$	(178,348	)	$	1,127
Trademarks		3,900		(3,900	)		—		3,900		(3,900	)		—
Customer lists		76,019		(75,091	)		928		76,019		(73,235	)		2,784
	$	259,394	$	(257,717	)	$	1,677	$	259,394	$	(255,483	)	$	3,911